II.1)
Scope of the procurement
Consultancy Services for Formative Evaluation PGII HPP
Reference number:
165054
79419000
-
Evaluation consultancy services
Services
II.1.4)
Short description
The Services comprises of conducting a formative evaluation of Irish Aid’s Programme Grant II (PGII) and Humanitarian Programme Plan (HPP) so as to
provide the Department’s management with an independent, evidence-based assessment of funding to Civil Society Organisations for humanitarian, development, and development education and assess whether the funding mechanisms are fit for purpose to deliver on the policy commitments in Ireland’s 2019 Policy for International Development “A Better World” and assess the operation of the current PGII and HPP programmes, in order to inform the design of the next round the funding mechanisms, including to analyse the extent to which the programmes should be combined.
II.1.6)
Information about lots
This contract is divided into lots:
no
II.1.7)
Total value of the procurement
Value excluding VAT:
200000.00
EUR
II.2.2)
Additional CPV code(s)
38900000
-
Miscellaneous evaluation or testing instruments
73430000
-
Test and evaluation
75210000
-
Foreign affairs and other services
75211000
-
Foreign-affairs services
II.2.4)
Description of the procurement
The Services comprises of conducting a formative evaluation of Irish Aid’s Programme Grant II (PGII) and Humanitarian Programme Plan (HPP) so as to
provide the Department’s management with an independent, evidence-based assessment of funding to Civil Society Organisations for humanitarian, development, and development education and assess whether the funding mechanisms are fit for purpose to deliver on the policy commitments in Ireland’s 2019 Policy for International Development “A Better World” and assess the operation of the current PGII and HPP programmes, in order to inform the design of the next round the funding mechanisms, including to analyse the extent to which the programmes should be combined.
Criteria below
Quality criterion
-
Name:
Tenderers’ Statement of Understanding and Methodology addressing Sections 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8
/
Weighting:
400
Quality criterion
-
Name:
Qualifications and expertise of proposed Team Leader
/
Weighting:
150
Quality criterion
-
Name:
Qualifications and expertise of team members
/
Weighting:
150
Cost criterion
-
Name:
Financial Schedule
/
Weighting:
30
II.2.11)
Information about options
Options:
no
II.2.13)
Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds:
no